17 Comments

The best time to was 30 years ago and the next best time is today is so true for everything Karena

We should have invested

We should have studied

We should have bought property

All of it to say compounding effects affect every part of our life

Expand full comment
author
Jan 29, 2023·edited Jan 30, 2023Author

So true, Promeet. But if you missed that boat, now is never too late (I hope).

Expand full comment

“How do we manage the climate conversation in parallel with the UN SDG goals that include the moral imperative of raising the world’s population out of poverty?” - this is something I think about a lot. Asking those who are just beginning to enjoy some of the comforts we have always known to give them up to help fix a problem we have caused feels wrong in so many ways.

Expand full comment
author

We are not the only ones thinking on this topic, Randy. Adrian put a link in his comment. And I will add a Jordan Peterson link that my sister-in-law forwarded to me.

We have to act in our present, not knowing what the future holds. I am stymied. But also pleasantly encouraged. One post. So many conversations! Amplifying the discussion.

Expand full comment

Thanks Karena. Taking us back to Rio was a good reminder about the main thing in play here – speed. All the agreements (inc. Montreal, Paris etc) shift the needle somewhat but not at the rate required. Where we end up will be determined by how fast we go and it seems there are still plenty of actors trying to preserve business as usual... Regarding the bit on your mind about balancing the needs of those that still need to develop – I found the conversation below helpful. With the idea that we have an emissions budget left to work with - some regions get access to that budget to grow while others need to reduce consumption (referred to as a macroeconomic diet) made some sense to me. It becomes an ‘allocation decision’ - not easy of course but I’d recommend a listen.

https://www.mcjcollective.com/my-climate-journey-podcast/timothe-parrique

Expand full comment
author

None of this is easy. It requires us all to "grow up" and make hard decisions - which is one of the retorts leveled at Greta and her peers. Working on my local energy initiative, I see how rules and regulation and process are dragging the wheels of great intentions and action.

My sister in law sent me this Jordan Peterson interview with scientist Steven Koonin. Heads up, some of the tone stung.

https://youtu.be/reaABJ5HpLk

Expand full comment

Karena, I like how you are teasing things out here. It’s a fast closing window of opportunity to act, that seems more and more obvious, as the planet burns, floods and melts. Policy makers need to act swiftly, and with good authority, to put in place firm policies to arrest the speed of degradation. Too many vested interests have the ear of governments everywhere. Given what’s known, and has been for decades, it’s almost criminal. And to be honest I’m inclined to strike out ‘almost’ in that last sentence.

Expand full comment
author

I think in this sentence you targeted the problem and possible solution: "policy makers need to act swiftly and with good authority". We have to push voters to put in appropriate policy makers. We need to volunteer to be those people.

And I agree - it is criminal. Reading the NYT article was heart-wrenching.

Expand full comment

It would make one weep with frustration Karena - but we must act. And inform ourselves, there’s quite a bit of misinformation out there.

Expand full comment

Fascinating!

Expand full comment
author

Thanks Lisa. Did one idea or fact stand out in particular?

Expand full comment

Honestly, more than one particular fact, I appreciate your perspective and your willingness to pivot and share your process as you considered all of this.

Expand full comment

I moved to Canada 6 months ago. Does having my tax dollars go to the Cdn government have any benefit over the same money going into US priorities? With respect to the issues you mention here I mean.

Expand full comment
author
Jan 29, 2023·edited Jan 29, 2023Author

Thanks for asking, Rick. Honestly, I don't know but I hope so. I was at dinner with a friend who works at the Canada Infrastructure Bank, so I asked him your question. He shared that their mandate is to heavily support environmentally conscious projects. Canada is heavily reliant on natural resources, so we have a constant rebalancing between both sides of the conversation. I like to think that our political calendar means we are not as easily swayed or manipulated by the lobbyists. I may be naive, however.

The background reading (NYT) for this piece was depressing as to what they knew and did not act on in the 1980s.

Expand full comment

Thanks Karena. I should probably get more directly informed about what my current gov't is up to here with respect to these issues. Thank you for the reading and research you are doing and sharing on our behalf, acting as a bit of depression shield. I hope you are able to keep your spirits up in the process, but you are acting and serving, which is clearly the best medicine for feeling agency.

Expand full comment
author
Jan 29, 2023·edited Jan 29, 2023Author

One of my sources of hope is that GenZ is now of voting age. They can drive change by changing the players. That pressure is what will ultimately move the needle.

During the Q&A after my presentation, I mentioned that I saw a strong trend to GenZ opting out of Fin and Tech (leaving money on the table) and into Sustainability. A day later I saw an article on Bloomberg with the same observation:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-01-05/how-to-quit-your-job-to-fight-climate-change

Expand full comment

Thanks for the article. Very useful to see/hear about how others are taking action in the corporate sector.

Expand full comment